Closed jmitchell closed 7 years ago
This targets https://github.com/ndmitchell/nsis/issues/6, should we add a note to the functions using NSIS 3? cc @ndmitchell
@jmitchell - thanks for the patch!
@domenkozar - good idea!
@ndmitchell Certainly. Thank you for maintaining the project--it's very useful!
Regarding the note for NSIS 3 functions would you simply like a comment, an ADT specifically for them, or both? (cc: @domenkozar)
Dunno - what do people suggest? One option would be to say that we expect people to be using NSIS, and call out the first few things that violate that assumption, but then very quickly just make it "the default". A static check seems overkill since we immediately compile the NSIS binary, and that will show it up pretty quickly.
I think nowadays anyone would just use 3.0, but best to note what's not supported there for those few unlucky devs :)
Merged, and I added a small note.
Give users the option to make a unicode installer. By default it's disabled because it's incompatible with older versions of Windows (see http://nsis.sourceforge.net/Docs/Chapter1.html#intro-unicode). The option itself is documented at http://nsis.sourceforge.net/Docs/Chapter4.html#aunicodetarget.