Version: 2.0.9.8s
User: PartyFlava
Summary:
The parameter to the wait:n command does not seem to be in a
standard/consistent time unit. I had heard that n was number of seconds but
this is not the case.
To reproduce, use the wait:n command and observe the actual wait time.
I believe 'n' should be specified in seconds as seconds are easy to measure by
a human and thus all guesswork of choosing 'n' is removed. The current system
of "decompile, guess n, recompile, run, repeat" is extremely tedious and error
prone.
Original issue reported on code.google.com by jason.ci...@gmail.com on 27 Sep 2013 at 10:44
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
jason.ci...@gmail.com
on 27 Sep 2013 at 10:44