Proposal to re-launch Wrapped NEAR contract, that doesn't take any storage deposits.
Reasoning: the current wrap.near contract has been inconvenient, because requires storage deposit before ft_transfer and doesn't have a way to transfer & unwrap support.
This issue is to achieve consensus on this proposal and track major apps transition if there is one.
Proposal to re-launch Wrapped NEAR contract, that doesn't take any storage deposits.
Reasoning: the current wrap.near contract has been inconvenient, because requires storage deposit before ft_transfer and doesn't have a way to transfer & unwrap support.
This issue is to achieve consensus on this proposal and track major apps transition if there is one.