codecov[bot]
commented
3 months ago Codecov Report
Attention: Patch coverage is 94.11765% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
Project coverage is 71.65%. Comparing base (
642f6a0) to head (b461974). Report is 3 commits behind head on master.
| Files | Patch % | Lines |
|---|---|---|
| chain/epoch-manager/src/adapter.rs | 85.71% | 0 Missing and 1 partial :warning: |
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #11671 +/- ## ========================================== - Coverage 71.67% 71.65% -0.03% ========================================== Files 788 788 Lines 161374 161371 -3 Branches 161374 161371 -3 ========================================== - Hits 115669 115634 -35 - Misses 40672 40699 +27 - Partials 5033 5038 +5 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/near/nearcore/pull/11671/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=near) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [backward-compatibility](https://app.codecov.io/gh/near/nearcore/pull/11671/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=near) | `0.23% <0.00%> (+<0.01%)` | :arrow_up: | | [db-migration](https://app.codecov.io/gh/near/nearcore/pull/11671/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=near) | `0.23% <0.00%> (+<0.01%)` | :arrow_up: | | [genesis-check](https://app.codecov.io/gh/near/nearcore/pull/11671/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=near) | `1.36% <0.00%> (+<0.01%)` | :arrow_up: | | [integration-tests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/near/nearcore/pull/11671/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=near) | `37.84% <88.23%> (-0.02%)` | :arrow_down: | | [linux](https://app.codecov.io/gh/near/nearcore/pull/11671/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=near) | `69.06% <94.11%> (-0.01%)` | :arrow_down: | | [linux-nightly](https://app.codecov.io/gh/near/nearcore/pull/11671/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=near) | `71.15% <94.11%> (-0.02%)` | :arrow_down: | | [macos](https://app.codecov.io/gh/near/nearcore/pull/11671/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=near) | `51.04% <94.11%> (-0.04%)` | :arrow_down: | | [pytests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/near/nearcore/pull/11671/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=near) | `1.59% <0.00%> (+<0.01%)` | :arrow_up: | | [sanity-checks](https://app.codecov.io/gh/near/nearcore/pull/11671/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=near) | `1.39% <0.00%> (+<0.01%)` | :arrow_up: | | [unittests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/near/nearcore/pull/11671/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=near) | `66.25% <94.11%> (-0.02%)` | :arrow_down: | | [upgradability](https://app.codecov.io/gh/near/nearcore/pull/11671/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=near) | `0.28% <0.00%> (+<0.01%)` | :arrow_up: | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=near#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
The number of validators displayed in the
INFO statslogging currently does not include chunk validators, which could be misleading post stateless validation launch. This fix works for both before stateless validation and post stateless validation. I verified a fix on a statelessnet node.