codecov[bot]
commented
4 days ago Codecov Report
Attention: Patch coverage is 96.42857% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
Project coverage is 71.80%. Comparing base (
59e2b88) to head (4d0b04e). Report is 2 commits behind head on master.
| Files | Patch % | Lines |
|---|---|---|
| chain/client/src/info.rs | 95.00% | 2 Missing :warning: |
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #11697 +/- ## ========================================== - Coverage 71.81% 71.80% -0.01% ========================================== Files 790 790 Lines 161945 161986 +41 Branches 161945 161986 +41 ========================================== + Hits 116294 116317 +23 - Misses 40618 40632 +14 - Partials 5033 5037 +4 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/near/nearcore/pull/11697/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=near) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [backward-compatibility](https://app.codecov.io/gh/near/nearcore/pull/11697/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=near) | `0.23% <0.00%> (-0.01%)` | :arrow_down: | | [db-migration](https://app.codecov.io/gh/near/nearcore/pull/11697/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=near) | `0.23% <0.00%> (-0.01%)` | :arrow_down: | | [genesis-check](https://app.codecov.io/gh/near/nearcore/pull/11697/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=near) | `1.35% <0.00%> (-0.01%)` | :arrow_down: | | [integration-tests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/near/nearcore/pull/11697/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=near) | `37.90% <96.42%> (+0.01%)` | :arrow_up: | | [linux](https://app.codecov.io/gh/near/nearcore/pull/11697/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=near) | `69.11% <96.42%> (-0.02%)` | :arrow_down: | | [linux-nightly](https://app.codecov.io/gh/near/nearcore/pull/11697/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=near) | `71.31% <96.42%> (+<0.01%)` | :arrow_up: | | [macos](https://app.codecov.io/gh/near/nearcore/pull/11697/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=near) | `52.64% <96.42%> (+0.07%)` | :arrow_up: | | [pytests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/near/nearcore/pull/11697/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=near) | `1.58% <0.00%> (-0.01%)` | :arrow_down: | | [sanity-checks](https://app.codecov.io/gh/near/nearcore/pull/11697/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=near) | `1.38% <0.00%> (-0.01%)` | :arrow_down: | | [unittests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/near/nearcore/pull/11697/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=near) | `66.34% <96.42%> (-0.01%)` | :arrow_down: | | [upgradability](https://app.codecov.io/gh/near/nearcore/pull/11697/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=near) | `0.27% <0.00%> (-0.01%)` | :arrow_down: | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=near#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
We already populate per-validator metrics for block and chunk production. This change also adds metrics for chunk-endorsement production by chunk validators.
Note that: 1) Chunk endorsement metrics currently are based on chunk production (ie. if a chunk is missed, this will reflect to endorsement metrics as missed endorsement as well) 2) We do not add shard-aggregated metrics, but metrics per shard. The users can get aggregated stats by averaging/summing for all shard.
Related issue: #11678