codecov[bot]
commented
2 months ago Codecov Report
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Project coverage is 71.50%. Comparing base (
6ab26a0) to head (365c1df). Report is 4 commits behind head on master.
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #11980 +/- ## ========================================== - Coverage 71.57% 71.50% -0.07% ========================================== Files 810 810 Lines 163803 163949 +146 Branches 163803 163949 +146 ========================================== - Hits 117237 117229 -8 - Misses 41486 41640 +154 Partials 5080 5080 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/near/nearcore/pull/11980/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=near) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [backward-compatibility](https://app.codecov.io/gh/near/nearcore/pull/11980/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=near) | `0.23% <ø> (-0.01%)` | :arrow_down: | | [db-migration](https://app.codecov.io/gh/near/nearcore/pull/11980/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=near) | `0.23% <ø> (-0.01%)` | :arrow_down: | | [genesis-check](https://app.codecov.io/gh/near/nearcore/pull/11980/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=near) | `1.33% <ø> (-0.01%)` | :arrow_down: | | [integration-tests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/near/nearcore/pull/11980/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=near) | `38.42% <ø> (-0.03%)` | :arrow_down: | | [linux](https://app.codecov.io/gh/near/nearcore/pull/11980/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=near) | `71.28% <ø> (-0.04%)` | :arrow_down: | | [linux-nightly](https://app.codecov.io/gh/near/nearcore/pull/11980/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=near) | `71.06% <ø> (-0.09%)` | :arrow_down: | | [macos](https://app.codecov.io/gh/near/nearcore/pull/11980/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=near) | `54.32% <ø> (-0.07%)` | :arrow_down: | | [pytests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/near/nearcore/pull/11980/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=near) | `1.60% <ø> (-0.01%)` | :arrow_down: | | [sanity-checks](https://app.codecov.io/gh/near/nearcore/pull/11980/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=near) | `1.40% <ø> (-0.01%)` | :arrow_down: | | [unittests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/near/nearcore/pull/11980/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=near) | `65.59% <ø> (-0.09%)` | :arrow_down: | | [upgradability](https://app.codecov.io/gh/near/nearcore/pull/11980/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=near) | `0.28% <ø> (-0.01%)` | :arrow_down: | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=near#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
Issue: https://github.com/near/nearcore/issues/11883 Add two tests:
gc_after_node_offline- make a node offline for more than 1 epoch and bring it back, eventually old block data should be gc-ed.gc_after_shard_switch- change tracked shard for a node, eventually old data (including chunks for the shard that is no longer tracked) should be gc-ed.Both tests currently fail.
Run with (for
gc_after_node_offline):