search

near / nearcore

Reference client for NEAR Protocol
https://near.org
GNU General Public License v3.0
2.32k stars 623 forks source link

chore: remove repetitive words #12036

Closed longhutianjie closed 1 month ago

codecov[bot] commented 1 month ago

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 71.52%. Comparing base (0e5e7c7) to head (bc18d52). Report is 22 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
.../runtime-params-estimator/src/estimator_context.rs 0.00% 1 Missing :warning:
Additional details and impacted files ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #12036 +/- ## ========================================== - Coverage 71.53% 71.52% -0.02% ========================================== Files 814 814 Lines 164424 164424 Branches 164424 164424 ========================================== - Hits 117623 117598 -25 - Misses 41640 41662 +22 - Partials 5161 5164 +3 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/near/nearcore/pull/12036/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=near) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [backward-compatibility](https://app.codecov.io/gh/near/nearcore/pull/12036/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=near) | `0.17% <ø> (ø)` | | | [db-migration](https://app.codecov.io/gh/near/nearcore/pull/12036/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=near) | `0.17% <ø> (ø)` | | | [genesis-check](https://app.codecov.io/gh/near/nearcore/pull/12036/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=near) | `1.28% <ø> (ø)` | | | [integration-tests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/near/nearcore/pull/12036/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=near) | `38.58% <0.00%> (-0.01%)` | :arrow_down: | | [linux](https://app.codecov.io/gh/near/nearcore/pull/12036/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=near) | `71.19% <0.00%> (-0.03%)` | :arrow_down: | | [linux-nightly](https://app.codecov.io/gh/near/nearcore/pull/12036/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=near) | `71.11% <0.00%> (-0.01%)` | :arrow_down: | | [macos](https://app.codecov.io/gh/near/nearcore/pull/12036/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=near) | `54.08% <ø> (+<0.01%)` | :arrow_up: | | [pytests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/near/nearcore/pull/12036/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=near) | `1.54% <ø> (ø)` | | | [sanity-checks](https://app.codecov.io/gh/near/nearcore/pull/12036/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=near) | `1.35% <ø> (ø)` | | | [unittests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/near/nearcore/pull/12036/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=near) | `65.41% <0.00%> (-0.02%)` | :arrow_down: | | [upgradability](https://app.codecov.io/gh/near/nearcore/pull/12036/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=near) | `0.21% <ø> (ø)` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=near#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Sajjon commented 1 month ago

@tayfunelmas @Longarithm

[!CAUTION] GH user longhutianjie is performing a supply chain attack! 🚫 BLOCK user immediatly and report him to Github 🚫

The first step is getting rid of "first time contributor" status.

The user has manually added the message "Signed-off-by: " to make the commit look more trust worthy. User has opened similar PRs in all these other repos in within the same hour:

Furthermore I'm pretty sure this is the same person or group as github.com/vivoxfold3, who tried performing the attack against these repos, with the exact same style: Manually adding the message "Signed-off-by: " and making trivial contributions to many crypto libs within the same hour: