Closed qywang2012 closed 6 years ago
As long, as there is no mainnet and you are free to broke everything, and you feel like you are capable of implementing it, there is no reason not to do this, working with segwit protocol is a bit easier for developers, because txid is guaranteed to be intact.
Some interesting reading here: https://bitcoincore.org/en/2016/01/26/segwit-benefits/
After reading some articles, the segwit is used to solve the txid issue in bitcoin, which is not exist in nebulas protocol.
It seems like the only benefit of segwit liked design is "less transaction data size (-65bytes)" in Chunk Sync mode.
Let me know when I miss anything.
Well, i also thought at the beginning, that segwit is not necessary for pos consensus blockchains...
Do you think it would be possible to make such changed in block structure later, using Protocol Code? If yes, than it is easy decision not to bother with SegWit now. If no, than we need some other opinions :)
Seems like the issue related to Segwit does not exist in Nebulas.
Close this issue.
Nebulae are discussing whether to use Segregated Witness. Should we need to separate the signatures from transaction body?
segwit
Anyone can comment on this and discuss it.