Introduce the problem statement here. This might be well-defined ('we need to tweak the parameter of a rule from X to Y to help reduce a certain type of abuse'), or more fuzzy ('we need to invest more in paying back technical debt').
Focus on the underlying problem that needs to be solved, as opposed to jumping to how you will solve it.
Why should we solve it?
Why is this an important problem for us to solve?
Is it a big enough problem to solve?
Should we solve it now, or later?
Provide specific data (quantitative or qualitative) wherever possible.
How do you propose to solve it?
Add details of your proposed change. This can be high-level as psuedocode and sketches of the architecture, or as low-level as Protocol Buffer and interface definitions. Decide what the context of the proposal is, and write appropriately.
Be explicit about what you are optimising for in this proposed solution — for example, 'we need to hit this deadline, so we'll accept the tech debt this entails'.
What other approaches did you consider?
In general, it's a red-flag if you haven't thought of a couple of different ways that you could approach the problem.
What does your proposed solution give you that these approaches don't?
What are they optimising for that isn't appropriate in this case?
What could go wrong?
What risks does your proposed change entail?
How will you mitigate them?
How could this system fail, and what would be the impact if it did?
tl;dr
What problem are you trying to solve?
Why should we solve it?
How do you propose to solve it?
What other approaches did you consider?
What could go wrong?