Closed TheDoctorRAB closed 7 years ago
Was that something we discussed before (one learning objective per node)? It doesn't matter to me either way, but I don't remember.
No, we didn't decide anything. We specifically decided to NOT decide in the abstract, and to wait until we had concrete examples. So my comments are more to open a conversation with this as a concrete example.
This one could be split, and that's ok with me, but I'm just concerned we'd be getting unwieldy with the nodes by sticking to one-to-one.
I'll close this and split the node.
This is longer and broader than I would choose... I would split this into one node per learning objective. It's easier to review that way, too, since it's easier to assess whether there is at least one assessment per objective