Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Aaargh! How do you turn this into a wishlist enhancement?
Original comment by chalsero...@gmail.com
on 21 Nov 2006 at 9:06
Could you give some more information?
Specto uses classes and all the watch_* classe inherit from the class watch and
the
configuration is the class watch_io in the file watch.py, so i don't see the
problem
here.
Or do you mean clean up main.py (class specto) and move all the gui functions
to a
new class gui?
Original comment by woutclym...@gmail.com
on 21 Nov 2006 at 10:12
I basically mean having a watch directory, with an __init__.py, which contains
watch.py and watch_*.py.
Then you can rename watch_* to just *, and then do things like
import watch.mail.gmail
Basically, it just cleans up the specto directory a bit, and allows you to
replace
all the '_' with '.' :)
Original comment by chalsero...@gmail.com
on 21 Nov 2006 at 11:04
Of course, it looks like main.py could also do with a bit of a spring clean :).
Original comment by chalsero...@gmail.com
on 21 Nov 2006 at 11:05
[just passing by to switch this issue as a "task", because it's not really a
feature
request and it's not a bug ;) ]
For the "Aaargh! How do you turn this into a wishlist enhancement?" question,
only
project members can change the issue types, I guess it's a done-by-design
feature of
google (it does annoy me a bit). If you start contributing to specto once in a
while,
I would gladly add you as member if you request so ;)
Original comment by nekoh...@gmail.com
on 21 Nov 2006 at 10:40
Original comment by chalsero...@gmail.com
on 2 Feb 2007 at 4:15
when doing this i think it would be great to make watch types work like
plug-ins, so
that new types can easily be added by just dropping a file in the directory, ie
not
hardcoding the types of watches there are into main.py anymore...(that would
make
main.py a lot leaner, too)
Original comment by thomas.m...@gmail.com
on 13 Feb 2007 at 6:45
I know at least two ways to do that, and I'll implement it once I get around to
refactoring watch.py.
That may take a while, though, and I'd publish it in a branch at first.
Original comment by chalsero...@gmail.com
on 14 Feb 2007 at 12:17
chalserogers, Could you provide this new setup.py file so we can start working
with
modules? thank you
Original comment by woutclym...@gmail.com
on 20 Sep 2007 at 9:59
Isn't that partly started in Wout's branch?
Original comment by nekoh...@gmail.com
on 4 Dec 2007 at 12:26
Original comment by woutclym...@gmail.com
on 4 Jan 2008 at 7:20
Original comment by nekoh...@gmail.com
on 16 Mar 2008 at 6:16
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
chalsero...@gmail.com
on 21 Nov 2006 at 9:04