Open nelsonic opened 2 years ago
Per developer per month pricing ... https://ihp.digitallyinduced.com/Pricing
Limiting features to paid users:
Lame.
After my painful saga with Ecto: https://github.com/dwyl/auth/pull/231#issuecomment-1345762532
I was seriously considering IHP ... because I really don't want to have to deal with Ecto
anymore.
And the reviews are compelling: https://www.g2.com/products/ihp/reviews/ihp-review-4936070
But I can't get over this pricing ... https://ihp.digitallyinduced.com/Pricing?yearly=on¤cy=currency_usd
Especially this:
What does the framework builder have any business knowing how much revenue my App makes? 🤷♂️ (🤦♂️ )
Even though I'm sure this platform would have a great Developer Experience, $1500/person/year
is a non-starter for most companies/orgs. 💰
It' bugs me that their "Basic" (free for Open Source) version is indeed basic, doesn't include OAuth ... 🤷♂️ WHY not? Does it cost them anything to make it available? 💭
Also what's up with:
"(soon)" ... ?
If your product [framework] already includes the feature, then by all means include it in your features table. But putting RBAC in your features table with a ✅ when it's not built is misleading. What is "soon"...? ⏳ It's been there on the features table for at least 6 months ... (see screenshot above) Cannot invest my time [100s of hours] into a platform with uncertainty. By all means have a Product/Features Roadmap and link to it prominently. But don't include something that isn't built in your "Features" table. 🤦♂️
https://ihp.digitallyinduced.com/
Intro: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UbDtS_mUMpI
Looks good. has quite a few things we don't have in Phoenix. But definitely not as "mature" as Phoenix especially when you factor in
LiveView
. 💭