Closed claudenirmf closed 3 years ago
Thanks, I added the year to the citation. However, the documentation is generated from comments in the ontology, so, I'd rather not add a BibTeX fragment to the ontology. It would require careful escaping and the rendering in different tools (including the generated html) might be problematic.
I checked the commit and the deployed website and did not find any differences. (In fact, http://purl.org/nemo/doc/gufo redirects to http://nemo-ufes.github.io/gufo/ which is served directly from the master.)
I understand now the reason for the confusion, you are using the actual ontology to generate the documentation.
The instructions for citing gUFO could include the BibTex entry as well, for example:
As far as I know, adding URLs nicely requires additional packages, so my example uses
howpublished
. The example also includes the publication year of gUFO, which is missing in the current citation instructions.Just one additional observation: the deployed website and the latest commit do not match.