Closed Jim8y closed 6 months ago
@roman-khimov told ya I can't write formal document, need you to do it. Open this pr to get a place for further discussion. Will close this one when you decide to write a formal one.
BTW, I am not rushing, I just don't know how. LOL.
Will close this one when you decide to write a formal one.
You've opened a PR. To me this means "I'm working on it with the goal to have it accepted eventually" (which includes fixing any problems and making it a real good standard). If that's the case, I'm more than happy to not do this because I have a pretty long TODO list (I will review/comment on it of course to help you). If that's not the case then I don't really understand why we have this PR. Issues are better suited for discussions.
Will close this one when you decide to write a formal one.
You've opened a PR. To me this means "I'm working on it with the goal to have it accepted eventually" (which includes fixing any problems and making it a real good standard). If that's the case, I'm more than happy to not do this because I have a pretty long TODO list (I will review/comment on it of course to help you). If that's not the case then I don't really understand why we have this PR. Issues are better suited for discussions.
Sure, I will open an issue and close this pr. Thank you very much for your help.
wait for roman to draft a standard version
This pr focus on making the
onNEP17Payment
method an NEP standard, such that user can declare their contract as payable and we can verify this method in our tools.This nep is backwards compatible, not a single smart contract or standards need to be updated.