Open cschuchardt88 opened 2 months ago
Expect 3 years.
I don't want to say it's not useful, but I'm not following why this is necessary. What does ERC-7621 have to do with needing a standard to ID LP tokens? It doesn't use one. Does Ethereum even have such a standard? I've never heard of it.
I can't imagine a competent dApp developer using any kind of automatic aggregation when building token baskets or similar protocols that might use LP tokens. Sounds like a great way to get exploited.
I'm not sure why we have it here. Does it require any changes to the core? I don't think so. It's something for proposals
. Then interested parties (that actually do these things and I doubt it's core developers, it's more like Flamingo developers) can come up with something if they need to.
Well all the current LP tokens violate NEP-17
any ways. Shouldn't even have NEP-17
as a "supported" in their contract.
We need a way to
id
LP tokens on the network. There is many reasons why to have this.Like https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7621