Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago
You mean we can give name tokens to parent? I have never tested this and think
that, if it's really a feature we want to support, then we should have a sample
with it. (If only to make sure we don't break anything.)
Original comment by philippe.beaudoin
on 25 Aug 2010 at 4:30
Yes we can, now at least. It's not a matter, it doesn't brake anything, we
weren't able to do it before because we didn't did thing right. While fixing
issue 160, I found a major bug that was preventing that kind of behavior and
also other related problems like explaned in issue 160.
I have test it and it works really fine, it only shows the presenter without
anything in his slot. Only problem is that we can't re init the presenter like
I said. Well not entirely true, works fine within onReaveal() clearSlot(slot).
But when you press back button form a child to it's parent, it doesn't do
anything since it's like changing. When we'll work on issue 169, on focus will
give us a way to re init it if that's what we want. Else, a parent will show
himself with all his children, something that I appreciate from times to times,
but not always.
The only remaining question from my point of view is: since the place that will
be shown is #main, is this the expected behavior to have also his child ?
I think yes, but some people may disagree.
Original comment by goudreau...@gmail.com
on 25 Aug 2010 at 5:06
Original comment by goudreau...@gmail.com
on 31 Aug 2010 at 6:58
Original comment by philippe.beaudoin
on 22 Sep 2010 at 1:35
Bumping to 0.6, preparing release 0.5.
Original comment by philippe.beaudoin
on 25 Jan 2011 at 6:33
We need unit tests for named parent presenter, or at least we need to exercise
them in a sample. Until we do this, I wouldn't advertise this as a feature of
GWTP. That is: an untested feature is not a feature. :)
Original comment by philippe.beaudoin
on 17 May 2011 at 2:06
Not only untested, I don't even think it's working anymore.
Original comment by goudreau...@gmail.com
on 17 May 2011 at 2:22
Bumping to 0.7, preparing release 0.6.
Original comment by philippe.beaudoin
on 6 Jun 2011 at 8:17
Original comment by philippe.beaudoin
on 1 Feb 2012 at 6:52
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
goudreau...@gmail.com
on 25 Aug 2010 at 3:40