Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
The section is now called Advanced features.
Original comment by philippe.beaudoin
on 1 Apr 2010 at 1:01
We'll worry about documentation later. Bumped to V0.2.
Original comment by philippe.beaudoin
on 1 Apr 2010 at 6:45
Original comment by philippe.beaudoin
on 7 Apr 2010 at 5:20
Original comment by philippe.beaudoin
on 9 Apr 2010 at 6:08
Other wiki clean-up needed:
- Proofreading (if anybody is interested)
- Have a table of content in each wiki page (a set of links at the top to the
various
sections)
- Use a left-column navigation system (this is easy to setup and can help a lot)
- Cross-link between samples (the getting started page should link to advanced
samples).
Original comment by philippe.beaudoin
on 3 May 2010 at 7:03
Bumped to V0.3.
Original comment by philippe.beaudoin
on 28 May 2010 at 7:51
I'll do those points :
- Have a table of content in each wiki page (a set of links at the top to the
various
sections)
- Use a left-column navigation system (this is easy to setup and can help a lot)
Original comment by goudreau...@gmail.com
on 30 May 2010 at 2:50
We will need to make sure the GettingStarted wiki does not reference the old
@PlaceInstance annotation and relies on the newer @PlaceProvider instead.
Original comment by philippe.beaudoin
on 11 Jun 2010 at 5:45
I'll do that as soon as we release 0.3 to be up to date with latest jar instead
of trunk. We sould bump this up to 0.4 since everything else is done.
Original comment by goudreau...@gmail.com
on 29 Jun 2010 at 3:41
I don't want to say 0.3 is out until the docs are in sync with it. They mostly
are, this will just need some proofreading. It will likely be the last thing we
do before the launch party. ;)
Original comment by philippe.beaudoin
on 29 Jun 2010 at 5:16
I discussed this with Phil and it seems that the only element blocking this
issue was already done.
Original comment by goudreau...@gmail.com
on 30 Jun 2010 at 12:57
I'll still leave it open as a reminder I have to proofread the doc everywhere
as a final step before release, I'll take the issue.
Original comment by philippe.beaudoin
on 30 Jun 2010 at 3:31
I would like to contribute to this. As you may know from the discussion group
I am attempting to learn this framework, and as a "new" person to it, in an
ideal position to document things that fresh eyes may have. I notice there
isn't a F.A.Q. page so I would potentially like to start there?
Let me know your thoughts?
Original comment by drgenejones
on 30 Jun 2010 at 10:45
You're welcome to start writing this FAQ. I'm adding you as a contributor right
away.
Original comment by philippe.beaudoin
on 30 Jun 2010 at 11:32
An extra pair of eyes would be welcome to make sure there are no leftovers from
0.2, but I think the wiki is pretty good, so I'm marking as done.
Original comment by philippe.beaudoin
on 21 Jul 2010 at 9:03
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
philippe.beaudoin
on 31 Mar 2010 at 6:09