Closed manandbytes closed 10 years ago
Please rebase this PR and I'll try it out as well!
Before actually releasing 2.0.0 I think this has to be fixed: https://github.com/neo4j-contrib/neoclipse/issues/62 So we're pretty close I'd say.
Done.
Before actually releasing 2.0.0 I think this has to be fixed: #62
I've never tried such case ;-), will take a look.
59 worked out well according to my quick testing under Ubuntu 64-bit, so I merged it.
Please rebase this PR and I'll try it out as well!
Before actually releasing 2.0.0 I think this has to be fixed: https://github.com/neo4j-contrib/neoclipse/issues/62 So we're pretty close I'd say.