Closed anamba closed 5 years ago
Hey! Thanks for this and sorry for not getting back sooner.
I'm not sure that this test is checking the right thing or not. I tried removing include Neo4j::UndeclaredProperties
from the PersonWithTimestamps
definition and it still was failing.
Looking at the timestamped model
definition (spec/shared_examples/timestamped_model.rb
), it looks like there are some examples from those examples which depend on the a
and b
properties existing. When I set those properties on the model the tests seem to pass.
Please let me know if I'm missing something
@anamba indeed the timestamped model
shared example requires too much context. So far there is a single usage of it. The shared_example would have to first made more generic and reusable. But if you see an issue in the code rather than spec I would suggest to formulate a new spec from scratch to demonstrate it. Unless of course you want to fix the shared_example first which would be appreciated.
Wow, blast from the past. :-) Sorry, but I no longer use this gem (using Elixir for new projects these days).
Hey, why wait? Here's that first pull request I promised.
Not sure if this is the right place or right way to test this case, but I thought it'd be a good way to show what I'm seeing.