Improve travis setup

[ProGM]

Fixes #11

@subvertallchris @cheerfulstoic

[subvertallchris]

Excellent!

On Wednesday, June 8, 2016, Piero Dotti notifications@github.com wrote:

Fixes #11 https://github.com/neo4jrb/neo4jrb_spatial/issues/11

@subvertallchris https://github.com/subvertallchris @cheerfulstoic

https://github.com/cheerfulstoic

You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:

https://github.com/neo4jrb/neo4jrb_spatial/pull/12 Commit Summary

• Improved travis setup.

File Changes

• D .ruby-version https://github.com/neo4jrb/neo4jrb_spatial/pull/12/files#diff-0 (1)
• M .travis.yml https://github.com/neo4jrb/neo4jrb_spatial/pull/12/files#diff-1 (14)
• M README.md https://github.com/neo4jrb/neo4jrb_spatial/pull/12/files#diff-2 (26)
• M Rakefile https://github.com/neo4jrb/neo4jrb_spatial/pull/12/files#diff-3 (2)

Patch Links:

• https://github.com/neo4jrb/neo4jrb_spatial/pull/12.patch
• https://github.com/neo4jrb/neo4jrb_spatial/pull/12.diff

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/neo4jrb/neo4jrb_spatial/pull/12, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/AD6E9-ddE2Pszt31Zm3wI8MKR5zwYEWzks5qJtUugaJpZM4IxCaP .

[cheerfulstoic]

I had some trouble getting Travis CI to work with the neo4j gem, but it's pretty stable now. I'd check out the .travis.yml for that, particularly the lines that I added for memory configuration.

You might also need JDK 8 (that's also in the .travis.yml)

[cheerfulstoic]

Otherwise it seems great to me ;)