Sourcery refactored refactor-generate-features-module branch

[sourcery-ai[bot]]

Branch refactor-generate-features-module refactored by Sourcery.

If you're happy with these changes, merge this Pull Request using the Squash and merge strategy.

See our documentation here.

Run Sourcery locally

Reduce the feedback loop during development by using the Sourcery editor plugin:

• VS Code
• PyCharm

Review changes via command line

To manually merge these changes, make sure you're on the refactor-generate-features-module branch, then run:

git fetch origin sourcery/refactor-generate-features-module
git merge --ff-only FETCH_HEAD
git reset HEAD^

[sourcery-ai[bot]]

Sourcery Code Quality Report

✅  Merging this PR will increase code quality in the affected files by 0.31%.

Quality metrics	Before	After	Change
Complexity	1.00 ⭐	1.00 ⭐	0.00
Method Length	35.48 ⭐	35.10 ⭐	-0.38 👍
Working memory	5.76 ⭐	5.67 ⭐	-0.09 👍
Quality	87.71% ⭐	88.02% ⭐	0.31% 👍

Other metrics	Before	After	Change
Lines	205	203	-2

Changed files	Quality Before	Quality After	Quality Change
nlp_profiler/numbers.py	95.63% ⭐	96.67% ⭐	1.04% 👍
nlp_profiler/sentiment_polarity.py	85.57% ⭐	85.63% ⭐	0.06% 👍
nlp_profiler/stop_words.py	91.41% ⭐	92.43% ⭐	1.02% 👍
slow-tests/performance_tests/test_perf_grammar_check.py	85.30% ⭐	85.30% ⭐	0.00%
slow-tests/performance_tests/test_perf_spelling_check.py	85.30% ⭐	85.30% ⭐	0.00%

Here are some functions in these files that still need a tune-up:

File	Function	Complexity	Length	Working Memory	Quality	Recommendation
slow-tests/performance_tests/test_perf_grammar_check.py	test_given_a_text_column_when_profiler_is_applied_with_high_level_analysis_then_it_finishes_quick	2 ⭐	122 😞	12 😞	60.51% 🙂	Try splitting into smaller methods. Extract out complex expressions
slow-tests/performance_tests/test_perf_spelling_check.py	test_given_a_text_column_when_profiler_is_applied_with_high_level_analysis_then_it_finishes_quick	2 ⭐	122 😞	12 😞	60.51% 🙂	Try splitting into smaller methods. Extract out complex expressions

Legend and Explanation

The emojis denote the absolute quality of the code:

• ⭐ excellent
• 🙂 good
• 😞 poor
• ⛔ very poor

The 👍 and 👎 indicate whether the quality has improved or gotten worse with this pull request.

---

Please see our documentation here for details on how these metrics are calculated.

We are actively working on this report - lots more documentation and extra metrics to come!

Let us know what you think of it by mentioning @sourcery-ai in a comment.

[codecov-io]

Codecov Report

Merging #30 into refactor-generate-features-module will not change coverage. The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@                         Coverage Diff                         @@
##           refactor-generate-features-module       #30   +/-   ##
===================================================================
  Coverage                             100.00%   100.00%           
===================================================================
  Files                                     21        21           
  Lines                                    360       358    -2     
  Branches                                  51        51           
===================================================================
- Hits                                     360       358    -2     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
nlp_profiler/numbers.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
nlp_profiler/sentiment_polarity.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
nlp_profiler/stop_words.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data Powered by Codecov. Last update 193f97a...8f6d048. Read the comment docs.