Refactor high level features

[neomatrix369]

Redoing the PR as something went wrong in the previous attempt

Now the high-level modules are placed inside the high_level_features folder

Related to #35 (and #34)

[sourcery-ai[bot]]

Sourcery Code Quality Report

Merging this PR leaves code quality unchanged.

Quality metrics	Before	After	Change
Complexity	1.00 ⭐	1.00 ⭐	0.00
Method Length	58.00 ⭐	58.00 ⭐	0.00
Working memory	8.86 🙂	8.86 🙂	0.00
Quality	77.64% ⭐	77.64% ⭐	0.00%

Other metrics	Before	After	Change
Lines	300	304	4

Changed files	Quality Before	Quality After	Quality Change
nlp_profiler/core.py	71.16% 🙂	71.16% 🙂	0.00%
slow-tests/performance_tests/test_perf_grammar_check.py	75.16% ⭐	75.16% ⭐	0.00%
slow-tests/performance_tests/test_perf_spelling_check.py	75.16% ⭐	75.16% ⭐	0.00%
tests/high_level/test_grammar_check.py	87.02% ⭐	87.02% ⭐	0.00%
tests/high_level/test_sentiment_polarity.py	79.63% ⭐	79.63% ⭐	0.00%
tests/high_level/test_sentiment_subjectivity.py	79.63% ⭐	79.63% ⭐	0.00%
tests/high_level/test_spelling_check.py	75.75% ⭐	75.75% ⭐	0.00%

Here are some functions in these files that still need a tune-up:

File	Function	Complexity	Length	Working Memory	Quality	Recommendation
nlp_profiler/core.py	apply_text_profiling	4 ⭐	133 😞	16 ⛔	51.83% 🙂	Try splitting into smaller methods. Extract out complex expressions
slow-tests/performance_tests/test_perf_grammar_check.py	test_given_a_text_column_when_profiler_is_applied_with_high_level_analysis_then_it_finishes_quick	2 ⭐	113 🙂	13 😞	60.07% 🙂	Extract out complex expressions
slow-tests/performance_tests/test_perf_spelling_check.py	test_given_a_text_column_when_profiler_is_applied_with_high_level_analysis_then_it_finishes_quick	2 ⭐	113 🙂	13 😞	60.07% 🙂	Extract out complex expressions
tests/high_level/test_spelling_check.py	test_given_a_text_when_spell_check_is_applied_then_spell_check_analysis_info_is_returned	2 ⭐	68 🙂	11 😞	69.77% 🙂	Extract out complex expressions
tests/high_level/test_sentiment_polarity.py	test_given_a_text_when_sentiment_analysis_is_applied_then_sentiment_analysis_info_is_returned	2 ⭐	59 ⭐	10 😞	73.06% 🙂	Extract out complex expressions

Legend and Explanation

The emojis denote the absolute quality of the code:

• ⭐ excellent
• 🙂 good
• 😞 poor
• ⛔ very poor

The 👍 and 👎 indicate whether the quality has improved or gotten worse with this pull request.

---

Please see our documentation here for details on how these metrics are calculated.

We are actively working on this report - lots more documentation and extra metrics to come!

Let us know what you think of it by mentioning @sourcery-ai in a comment.

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

Merging #37 into master will not change coverage. The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##            master       #37   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           21        21           
  Lines          358       358           
  Branches        51        51           
=========================================
  Hits           358       358           

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
...filer/high_level_features/grammar_quality_check.py	100.00% <ø> (ø)
...profiler/high_level_features/sentiment_polarity.py	100.00% <ø> (ø)
...iler/high_level_features/sentiment_subjectivity.py	100.00% <ø> (ø)
...iler/high_level_features/spelling_quality_check.py	100.00% <ø> (ø)
nlp_profiler/core.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
nlp_profiler/high_level_features/__init__.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data Powered by Codecov. Last update 3aac701...99249e2. Read the comment docs.