With the new TexImage API cube map faces are processed and output
simultaneously, but DDS files expect images sorted by face not by mipmap.
Maybe it's not a good idea to represent cube maps or texture arrays with
TexImage and it would make more sense to have another abstraction for that.
That would certainly simplify TexImage, and we could use a better name for it,
like simply "Image".
The main motivation for combining faces in the same image was to implement
cubemap filtering properly, but that could be done with a different object.
Original issue reported on code.google.com by cast...@gmail.com on 3 Nov 2010 at 6:30
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
cast...@gmail.com
on 3 Nov 2010 at 6:30