Closed zchee closed 5 years ago
I'd suggest to remove the license from the top of all files, there is no legal reason for that. Only the LICENSE file is needed.
Use 2016 year, Because, in the Go language, it is customary not to change it after the year you commit the file.
Yes, it's unnecessary and silly ritual to "update the year". I don't know why people do that.
@justinmk
I'd suggest to remove the license from the top of all files, there is no legal reason for that. Only the LICENSE file is needed.
Yeah I know, Apache license said should. This commit is just in case. So, should I close this pull request? up to you.
Off topic, I want hear your opinions. If when adding new implementation with new file, should I also not add license header cooment? If not, the author name is I think would be better to "The go-client Authors." or "Neovim Authors" etc. because garyburd has been not a maintainers. What do you think?
Yes, it's unnecessary and silly ritual to "update the year". I don't know why people do that.
Totally agreed :P
Also,
I'd suggest to remove the license from the top of all files
If you want to it, I'll send another pull request that's remove license comment from all go files.
If when adding new implementation with new file, should I also not add license header cooment?
Don't need license header.
Gary still has copyright on most of the code, I wouldn't bother changing it to "go client authors".
@justinmk
I see, I said
If when adding new implementation with new file, should I also not add license header cooment? If not, ...
So my concern was resolved.
You reactioned my comment. I will send pull request that remove license header from all files.
close.
Add license header to
apiimp.go
template.In the Apache license "APPENDIX: HOW TO APPLY THE APACHE LICENSE TO YOUR WORK" section,
Use
2016
year, Because, in the Go language, it is customary not to change it after the year you commit the file.