Closed shaolinseed closed 2 years ago
The defaults are the same as the notebook, so the outputs should be fairly similar, though randomness will still be a factor. There is a "-d" option with this one to make things a bit more deterministic, but there is still randomness.
The defaults are the same as the notebook, so the outputs should be fairly similar, though randomness will still be a factor. There is a "-d" option with this one to make things a bit more deterministic, but there is still randomness.
hmm, theres definately somehting different going on. I've tried multiple images and it appears your version has a different style to the outputs i'm getting using sborquez docker version and the collab notebook. I will post some examples later today to show you what i mean - it's almost like a more blocky style, hard to explain.
this is what i mean each time i get a certain style when using your repo , been trying to figure out why but not sure..
(the top image is your repo vs bottom which is based off another notebook)
Mine is based of the linked notebook, so if you're not using that that same linked notebook then that will account for the differences.
I've now added the "--cut_method" option which allows for older cutout methods to be used, such an in the pre-kornia and pooling days. Note that the aug option only works with the latest cut method.
Different resolutions will produce different output. I don't know of a way to produce the same image when using a different resolution.
Additionally, I've seen some notebooks use a learning rate optimizer, like StepLR, which can be overlooked since it's not in the normal parameters but definitely has an effect on the output.
Different resolutions will produce different output. I don't know of a way to produce the same image when using a different resolution.
That is expected behaviour. Even the same size won't generate the same image each time.
I got an amazing output that i got on the google collab notebook and am trying to replicate it to a larger scale running locally on my 3090. For some reason the outputs appear to have a different style than that of collab (im using the same model, prompt, seed and save interval..)
Is there something thats been altered ? Is it to do with the optimizer or learning rate? (these can't be specified on the collab notebook).
Thanks alot for this bit of software it has given me hours of experimenting and fun!