Closed wprazuch closed 2 years ago
The seed is one big factor, but then even with a seed and some determinism turned on you'll get differences.
@nerdyrodent Yes, I thought about that, however, I guess this case also has problems with preserving the global structure. I can imagine the photo to not be identical to the example in the README.md
, but regardless how much I try, I cannot create an image, which has a nice, round apple-looking object, and a proper bowl.
Any idea what is the problem? 🤔
If you want a round apple and a proper bowl, one way is to use an init image. Outside of that, you'll be looking at prompt engineering and luck ;)
All good. Seems like my A100 SXM did not like the drivers I installed (on Ubuntu 20.04) and produced such weird-looking output. Updating the drivers significantly improved the quality of results (don't know why, and still did not reproduce the results though :P).
Interesting note: for the A100 SXM, the PyTorch version specified in the requirements had inference problems - an average iteration lasted 20 seconds. Raising the PyTorch version significantly sped up the inference (~10 times faster). This may be related to the GPU - SXM requires some additional packages for the inference to run fast and higher PyTorch versions include it and this one does not.
Hello, First of all, thank you for an amazing repository - this is both very spectacular and well-written. I am having a problem reproducing the results from the
README.md
file though. I was trying to reproduce the following input:python generate.py -p "A painting of an apple in a fruit bowl"
However, at the output I am obtaining the following image:
Does anyone have the same issue or can guide me on what could be the reason for such discrepancies? Regards