search

nervosnetwork / ckb-light-client

CKB light client reference implementation
MIT License
14 stars 16 forks source link

feat(rpc): add rpc method `estimate_cycles` #180

Closed yangby-cryptape closed 7 months ago

yangby-cryptape commented 7 months ago

Description

It's too expensive to keep a CKB testnet / mainnet node for debugging.

codecov-commenter commented 7 months ago

Codecov Report

Attention: 14 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (ba5545e) 72.33% compared to head (ad946de) 72.22%.

Files Patch % Lines
src/service.rs 0.00% 14 Missing :warning:
Additional details and impacted files ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## develop #180 +/- ## =========================================== - Coverage 72.33% 72.22% -0.11% =========================================== Files 25 25 Lines 6648 6658 +10 =========================================== Hits 4809 4809 - Misses 1839 1849 +10 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/nervosnetwork/ckb-light-client/pull/180/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=nervosnetwork) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [unittests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/nervosnetwork/ckb-light-client/pull/180/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=nervosnetwork) | `72.22% <0.00%> (-0.11%)` | :arrow_down: | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=nervosnetwork#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.