Open arichiardi opened 7 years ago
I'm fine with it if you think it can be implemented without many changes to the plugin.
This has some quirk, and in particular the shadow-cljs compile
command wants a parameter, the build-id.
I think the idea here would be to reuse the stage
variable from serverless
Uhm, I think I am try to fit square pegs in a round hole with this one, shadow-cljs
controls the path of the generated artifact and there is no way to make it optional.
Hi @moea!
Given that now
serverless-cljs-plugin
is very flexible regarding compilers, what about adding shadow-cljs?There should be a very low amount of work to do there, because it already provides its on
shadow-cljs.edn
file for configuring things, we'd just need to trigger the command line command with the necessary parameters (:functions
definitions I guess).I myself like to work with the lumo for the speed of development and then compile production with something more solid (as you've seen, the
lumo
compiler is in its very early stages).What do you think?