Should the execution contexts be per-example?

[angelsanzn]

Currently, execution contexts are shared among all examples in a group, even among non-sibling examples, so the following fails twice:

with description('top level'):
    with context('first group'):
        with it('an example'):
            self.value = 10

        with it('a second example'):
            expect(self).not_to(have_property('value'))

    with context('second group'):
        with it('another example'):
            expect(self).not_to(have_property('value'))

I believe each example should be given its own execution context. That way, we can enforce a bit more test independence. Having this would mean running all hooks once per example, and I don't see a straightforward way to do it with the current relationship betwen Example and ExampleGroup.

Do you think this behaviour is desirable? Or do you think it's fine to share execution contexts?

[nestorsalceda]

Aye, this is desirable. You should not rely on test order, and thus every example has it own execution context.

In 0.9 series this behaviour si achieved.

Thanks you @angelsanz !

[angelsanzn]

Yeah, nice! 👏