search

net-commons / common-logging

A portable logging abstraction for .NET
http://net-commons.github.io/common-logging
Apache License 2.0
649 stars 205 forks source link

Common.Logging.Core should also support .netstandard libraries #145

Closed Portikus closed 7 years ago

Portikus commented 7 years ago

Hello everybody,

in my team we are developing some libraries as .netstandard libraries. In this libraries we want to add Common.Logging.Core but the nuget package does not support .netstandard. Is it possible that there will be a version that supports .netstandard?

Greetings

Florian

sbohlen commented 7 years ago

Yes, the plans are definitely for Common.Logging.Core to support .NET Standard. Evaluating just exactly which version of .NET Standard (lowest version) we can get away with is Step 1. I hope to have this done this coming weekend, after which we can better evaluate the release plans for when this is able to happen (e.g., likely we can fold this into the next 3.x release rather than having to wait for 4.0).

donatasvyzasdb commented 7 years ago

Is there an estimate on when release of a stable nuget with .NET Standard support will be available?

sbohlen commented 7 years ago

I can't really provide an estimate until I can determine our level of compat. with the various .NET Standard versions (work scheduled for this coming weekend). Assuming nothing untoward crops up, I'd expect this could be folded into the next planned 3.x release.

This release is already in a beta and the only real blocker to getting it to a full GA at present is our having time to properly resolve a series of NuGet bundling/PCL profile support issues. Since these are related/superseded by proper support for .NET Standard, my expectation is that this will (probably) all collapse into a single (easy to resolve) issue, clearing the pending blockers to an RC that can quickly move to GA.

I'll come back to this thread as soon as I have a better handle on timeline, but my blind prediction at present looks something like this:

sbohlen commented 7 years ago

See #148 for our intended approach to this. Would be interested in feedback from everyone on this thread/issue.

sbohlen commented 7 years ago

Closing this issue as superseded by #148.