The current abstraction of resource (WARC records) resolving expects [WARC-filename, offset]. By extending this to [WARC-filename, offset, timestamp, URL] it should be possible to use PyWB as backend for resolving. This would work well for setups that already have PyWB running and don't want to add a new exposure point for their WARCs.
The current abstraction of resource (WARC records) resolving expects
[WARC-filename, offset]
. By extending this to[WARC-filename, offset, timestamp, URL]
it should be possible to use PyWB as backend for resolving. This would work well for setups that already have PyWB running and don't want to add a new exposure point for their WARCs.Suggested by Ben O'Brien