Closed giorio94 closed 1 year ago
Hi @giorio94. Thanks for your PR.
I am @kingmakerbot. You can interact with me issuing a slash command in the first line of a comment. Currently, I understand the following commands:
/rebase
: Rebase this PR onto the master branch/merge
: Merge this PR into the master branch/hold
: Adds hold label to prevent merging with /merge/unhold
: Removes the hold label to allow merging with /merge/deploy-staging
: Deploy a staging environment to test this PR (the build-all
flag enables user environments building)/undeploy-staging
: Manually undeploy the staging environmentMake sure this PR appears in the CrownLabs changelog, adding one of the following labels:
kind/breaking
: :boom: Breaking Changekind/feature
: :rocket: New Featurekind/bug
: :bug: Bug Fixkind/cleanup
: :broom: Code Refactoringkind/docs
: :memo: Documentation/deploy-staging
/deploy-staging
@QcFe I've rebased this PR, solving the conflicts introduced by the new MyDrive feature and the removal of the old one. Before merging, please give it a try in the staging environment, to make sure everything still works properly.
Thank you so much @giorio94, will go through tests on monday hopefully
/rebase
/deploy-staging
@giorio94 Sorry for the impossible delay. It seems there's a mismatch between the tenant cmd/main and the helm: the flag from helm is tenant-ns-keep-alive
but the expected flag is tenant-operator-ns-keep-alive
. I'll proceed with manual fix on the deployed staging to see everything else is correct
@giorio94 Sorry for the impossible delay. It seems there's a mismatch between the tenant cmd/main and the helm: the flag from helm is
tenant-ns-keep-alive
but the expected flag istenant-operator-ns-keep-alive
. I'll proceed with manual fix on the deployed staging to see everything else is correct
I've updated the PR to make the flags match. I've opted for tenant-ns-keep-alive
, since this is related to tenants themselves, and not to the tenant operator.
/deploy-staging
/merge
Your staging environment has been correctly teared-down!
Description
This PR aggregates the modifications originally proposed in #821 (by @rs59) and #827 (by @QcFe), and preserved in the corresponding commits. Additionally, it introduces a set of minor improvements, as well as of dedicated tests.
Supersedes: #821, #827
How Has This Been Tested?
Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Please also note any relevant details for your test configuration.