Open ivanocerrato opened 7 years ago
I propose [doubledecker]
I agree.. But this was just an example :) Almost all the parameters are referred with different names in different components :(
Since we would like to replace DD soon, I would propose "[messagebus]".
I'm noting that each component has different configuration files, i.e., they use different names for the same information. For example, in the SDN-DO we use the [messaging] section for the information about the connection with the DD broker, while in the OS-DO there in the [doubledecker] section.
We should meet and decide common names for all the modules that are part of the FROG.