Open fool opened 5 years ago
nope. Or at least, if it has, nobody has mentioned to me that it is now a step in the "releasing/changing API endpoints" process and I'd bet it wasn't added there (if there is even a there, there).
It's probably worth taking up as adding to to the project template we're using now in notion though.
Yes I agree. It seems to me the OpenAPI definition has few discrepancies. Having a process for updating it might be a good way to ensure our clients and the API documentation are in sync with the API.
Yes! As we keep moving towards more "docs-driven devlopment", we're hoping to have it be part of the API dev process to PR changes to the OpenAPI definition before working on changes.
(Of course, we'll also need some sort of process for finding and correcting existing gaps.)
@verythorough - great to hear!
The process you mention is "just" someone making time for this:
https://github.com/netlify/open-api/issues/131
which I realize doesn't say anything new but it's effectively "audit the code"
On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 1:35 PM Jessica Parsons notifications@github.com wrote:
Yes! As we keep moving towards more "docs-driven devlopment", we're hoping to have it be part of the API dev process to PR changes to the OpenAPI definition before working on changes.
(Of course, we'll also need some sort of process for finding and correcting existing gaps.)
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/netlify/open-api/issues/130?email_source=notifications&email_token=AABX5IGV67OMP7C52GHO2QLQKUXXVA5CNFSM4GPBHBNKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOD7HZ3QQ#issuecomment-533700034, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AABX5IAOUPQNRIE4GBTGVTLQKUXXVANCNFSM4GPBHBNA .
Yeah, I suppose "process" over-sells it a bit. 😛
@fool, has this process been solved?