Dreaded "Section 11" had caused more trouble than any other section.
NBC Change
New Identifier Not Mandatory
WG list discussion has resulted in the following change text change in this section
OLD
Otherwise, if the semantics of any previous definition are changed
(i.e., if a non-editorial change is made to any definition other than
those specifically allowed above), then this MUST be achieved by a
new definition with a new identifier.
In statements that have any data definition statements as
substatements, those data definition substatements MUST NOT be
reordered. If new data definition statements are added, they can be
added anywhere in the sequence of existing substatements.
NEW
Otherwise, if the semantics of any previous definition are changed
(i.e., if a non-editorial change is made to any definition other than
those specifically allowed above), then this SHOULD be achieved by a
new definition with a new identifier.
In statements that have any data definition statements as
substatements, those data definition substatements SHOULD NOT be
reordered. If new data definition statements are added, they can be
added anywhere in the sequence of existing substatements.
Other refinements may be identified during development
Must Do: complexity: medium, bc: low, importance: high
module update rules
Dreaded "Section 11" had caused more trouble than any other section.
NBC Change
New Identifier Not Mandatory
WG list discussion has resulted in the following change text change in this section
OLD
NEW
Other refinements may be identified during development
Must Do: complexity: medium, bc: low, importance: high