Add new filters allowing FLP-based dedup

[jotak]

Note this PR is based on 2 other non-merged PRs - commit https://github.com/netobserv/flowlogs-pipeline/commit/ae226f9826f46df792cd78174c8a87b80eebcafe is the significant one

Description

• New "remove_entry_all_satisfied" filter type: entry is removed only if all the conditions (represented by nested rules) are satisfied. This allows to have logical AND in filter conditions, whereas previously it was only possible to have logical OR

• New "conditional_sampling" filter type: allows to have random sampling based on conditions. For example, a flow matching conditions A and B may have a sampling ratio of 1:10 whereas a flow matching condition C has 1:100 sampling and all other flows are 1:1

• Introduced a "preprocess" function on rules; currently it's only used to be able to cast the Value interface{} as an int (otherwise it comes as a float64); but could be also used in the future for other purpose, e.g. regex pre-compiling

• Add tests

Breaking change

The configuration of the removeEntryIfXXX rules is modified, they now all share the same key for additional configuration, which is named removeEntry

For example, a rule previously written as:

      filter:
        rules:
        - type: remove_entry_if_exists
          removeEntryIfExists:
            input: srcPort

must be changed to:

      filter:
        rules:
        - type: remove_entry_if_exists
          removeEntry:
            input: srcPort

Same applies to rules of type remove_entry_if_doesnt_exist, remove_entry_if_equal and remove_entry_if_not_equal.

Dependencies

n/a

Checklist

If you are not familiar with our processes or don't know what to answer in the list below, let us know in a comment: the maintainers will take care of that.

• [x] Will this change affect NetObserv / Network Observability operator? If not, you can ignore the rest of this checklist.
• [ ] Is this PR backed with a JIRA ticket? If so, make sure it is written as a title prefix (in general, PRs affecting the NetObserv/Network Observability product should be backed with a JIRA ticket - especially if they bring user facing changes).
• [ ] Does this PR require product documentation?
  • [ ] If so, make sure the JIRA epic is labelled with "documentation" and provides a description relevant for doc writers, such as use cases or scenarios. Any required step to activate or configure the feature should be documented there, such as new CRD knobs.
• [ ] Does this PR require a product release notes entry?
  • [ ] If so, fill in "Release Note Text" in the JIRA.
• [ ] Is there anything else the QE team should know before testing? E.g: configuration changes, environment setup, etc.
  • [ ] If so, make sure it is described in the JIRA ticket.
• QE requirements (check 1 from the list):
  • [ ] Standard QE validation, with pre-merge tests unless stated otherwise.
  • [ ] Regression tests only (e.g. refactoring with no user-facing change).
  • [ ] No QE (e.g. trivial change with high reviewer's confidence, or per agreement with the QE team).

[jotak]

Resource footprints look good: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1qakBaK1dk_rERO30k1cSR4W-Nn0SXW4A3lqQ1sZC4rE/edit#gid=705512397 I ran two scenarios, one for dropping duplicates and another for sampling 1:50 duplicates. => both of them show around -30% CPU/memory/storage usage by Loki; FLP CPU decreased by ~12% and FLP memory decreased by 16% in drop scenario and 10% in sampling scenario.

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 76.92308% with 27 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 67.41%. Comparing base (d2b2352) to head (fb76a92).

Files	Patch %	Lines
pkg/api/transform_filter.go	46.15%	11 Missing and 3 partials :warning:
pkg/pipeline/transform/transform_filter.go	85.71%	10 Missing and 3 partials :warning:

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #640 +/- ## ========================================== - Coverage 67.41% 67.41% -0.01% ========================================== Files 102 103 +1 Lines 7589 7641 +52 ========================================== + Hits 5116 5151 +35 - Misses 2162 2176 +14 - Partials 311 314 +3 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/netobserv/flowlogs-pipeline/pull/640/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=netobserv) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [unittests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/netobserv/flowlogs-pipeline/pull/640/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=netobserv) | `67.41% <76.92%> (-0.01%)` | :arrow_down: | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=netobserv#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 76.92308% with 27 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 67.41%. Comparing base (d2b2352) to head (fb76a92). Report is 27 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #640 +/- ## ========================================== - Coverage 67.41% 67.41% -0.01% ========================================== Files 102 103 +1 Lines 7589 7641 +52 ========================================== + Hits 5116 5151 +35 - Misses 2162 2176 +14 - Partials 311 314 +3 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/netobserv/flowlogs-pipeline/pull/640/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=netobserv) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [unittests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/netobserv/flowlogs-pipeline/pull/640/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=netobserv) | `67.41% <76.92%> (-0.01%)` | :arrow_down: | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=netobserv#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more. | [Files](https://app.codecov.io/gh/netobserv/flowlogs-pipeline/pull/640?dropdown=coverage&src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=netobserv) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [pkg/pipeline/transform/transform\_filter.go](https://app.codecov.io/gh/netobserv/flowlogs-pipeline/pull/640?src=pr&el=tree&filepath=pkg%2Fpipeline%2Ftransform%2Ftransform_filter.go&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=netobserv#diff-cGtnL3BpcGVsaW5lL3RyYW5zZm9ybS90cmFuc2Zvcm1fZmlsdGVyLmdv) | `88.98% <85.71%> (-0.15%)` | :arrow_down: | | [pkg/api/transform\_filter.go](https://app.codecov.io/gh/netobserv/flowlogs-pipeline/pull/640?src=pr&el=tree&filepath=pkg%2Fapi%2Ftransform_filter.go&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=netobserv#diff-cGtnL2FwaS90cmFuc2Zvcm1fZmlsdGVyLmdv) | `46.15% <46.15%> (ø)` | |

[jotak]

This has no impact on netobserv operator currently, hence marking no-qe

[jotak]

/approve

[openshift-ci[bot]]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jotak

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files: - ~~[OWNERS](https://github.com/netobserv/flowlogs-pipeline/blob/main/OWNERS)~~ [jotak] Approvers can indicate their approval by writing `/approve` in a comment Approvers can cancel approval by writing `/approve cancel` in a comment

[jotak]

/test unit