netobserv / netobserv-ebpf-agent

Network Observability eBPF Agent
Apache License 2.0
127 stars 32 forks source link

Bump github.com/cilium/ebpf from 0.13.2 to 0.14.0 #308

Closed dependabot[bot] closed 6 months ago

dependabot[bot] commented 6 months ago

Bumps github.com/cilium/ebpf from 0.13.2 to 0.14.0.

Release notes

Sourced from github.com/cilium/ebpf's releases.

v0.14.0

btf: support for CO-RE relocations against kernel modules

It's now possible to use CO-RE relocations against types defined in kernel modules. See cilium/ebpf#1300 by @​brycekahle.

link: netkit support

The link package now allows attaching to netkit interfaces. See cilium/ebpf#1257 by @​hemanthmalla

link: support for iterating links

The new link.Iterator type allows enumerating all BPF links active. See cilium/ebpf#1392 by @​mpastyl.

Bugfixes

  • ringbuf: fixed a bug which can lead to corrupt data on arm64, see cilium/ebpf#1375

Breaking changes

github.com/cilium/ebpf

  • ProgramOptions is not comparable anymore due to KernelModuleTypes.

github.com/cilium/ebpf/btf

  • CORERelocate had its singature change once again.

What's Changed

... (truncated)

Commits
  • fb45005 link: add Iterator
  • 73b877d link: disable uprobe tests on v4.9
  • a65f3dc cmd/bpf2go: don't require internet connection in tests
  • ad37d7f chore: fix some comments
  • 2528370 Fix GitHub edit link on every page
  • de991c6 doc: add DCO
  • cef96c3 examples: avoid depending on internal packages
  • 9a277ae tests: remove !IsNativeEndian skips
  • e64398a internal: remove ClangEndian
  • 65e1d0c gh: do not hide internal/sys/types.go in diffs
  • Additional commits viewable in compare view


Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.


Dependabot commands and options
You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR: - `@dependabot rebase` will rebase this PR - `@dependabot recreate` will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it - `@dependabot merge` will merge this PR after your CI passes on it - `@dependabot squash and merge` will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it - `@dependabot cancel merge` will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging - `@dependabot reopen` will reopen this PR if it is closed - `@dependabot close` will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually - `@dependabot show ignore conditions` will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency - `@dependabot ignore this major version` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) - `@dependabot ignore this minor version` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) - `@dependabot ignore this dependency` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
openshift-ci[bot] commented 6 months ago

Hi @dependabot[bot]. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a netobserv member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available [here](https://git.k8s.io/community/contributors/guide/pull-requests.md). If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the [kubernetes/test-infra](https://github.com/kubernetes/test-infra/issues/new?title=Prow%20issue:) repository.
codecov-commenter commented 6 months ago

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Project coverage is 33.84%. Comparing base (5f3c1b2) to head (4181caf).

:exclamation: Current head 4181caf differs from pull request most recent head aabd4ef. Consider uploading reports for the commit aabd4ef to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #308 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 33.84% 33.84% ======================================= Files 47 47 Lines 3865 3865 ======================================= Hits 1308 1308 Misses 2469 2469 Partials 88 88 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/netobserv/netobserv-ebpf-agent/pull/308/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=netobserv) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [unittests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/netobserv/netobserv-ebpf-agent/pull/308/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=netobserv) | `33.84% <ø> (ø)` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=netobserv#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

msherif1234 commented 6 months ago

/lgtm /approve

openshift-ci[bot] commented 6 months ago

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: msherif1234

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files: - ~~[OWNERS](https://github.com/netobserv/netobserv-ebpf-agent/blob/main/OWNERS)~~ [msherif1234] Approvers can indicate their approval by writing `/approve` in a comment Approvers can cancel approval by writing `/approve cancel` in a comment
msherif1234 commented 6 months ago

/lgtm

msherif1234 commented 6 months ago

/test unit