search

netobserv / netobserv-ebpf-agent

Network Observability eBPF Agent
Apache License 2.0
127 stars 32 forks source link

Bump github.com/cilium/ebpf from 0.14.0 to 0.15.0 #324

Closed dependabot[bot] closed 5 months ago

dependabot[bot] commented 5 months ago

Bumps github.com/cilium/ebpf from 0.14.0 to 0.15.0.

Release notes

Sourced from github.com/cilium/ebpf's releases.

v0.15.0

btf: bpf_core_type_matches is now supported

Programs can now use bpf_core_type_matches() for a stricter compatibility check. See cilium/ebpf#1366.

program, btf: improve debuggability when CO-RE or kfunc fixup fails

The library now tries to return a more informative error when loading a program fails due to a failed CO-RE relocation or a missing kfunc. See cilium/ebpf#1402.

btf: synthesise instruction comments into line info

asm.Comment in an instruction's Source() are now passed to the kernel in the form of BTF line info. See cilium/ebpf#1417.

perf: add WakeupEvents support to Reader

A perf Reader can now be configured to be woken up after a specific number of events / samples have been submitted. See cilium/ebpf#1404.

Bugfixes

  • program: fix loading a program which targets a function in a kernel module when CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF_MODULES is disabled, see #1440.

Breaking changes

github.com/cilium/ebpf/btf

  • Copy: the transform argument was removed. Use the new btf.As function instead.
  • Transformer: removed. See above.

What's Changed

... (truncated)

Commits
  • 20ddfe1 program: don't return error when kmod BTF is disabled
  • 7719d2f Use latest Go version for ARM64 and VM tests in CI
  • 6dd097a doc: rephrase supported kernel versions
  • 7fedde8 fix function name
  • 46b2a3d build(deps): bump idna from 3.6 to 3.7 in /docs
  • 32b95e4 Define LookupLock by means of BPF_F_LOCK
  • 1d00992 btf: Add support for bpf_core_type_matches()
  • d4bceb5 map: add user-friendly message when ringbuffer size is incorrect
  • 2e1ba13 internal: move IsPow
  • 5d2a5d1 btf: refuse reloTypeIDTarget for kmod types
  • Additional commits viewable in compare view


Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.

Dependabot commands and options
You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR: - `@dependabot rebase` will rebase this PR - `@dependabot recreate` will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it - `@dependabot merge` will merge this PR after your CI passes on it - `@dependabot squash and merge` will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it - `@dependabot cancel merge` will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging - `@dependabot reopen` will reopen this PR if it is closed - `@dependabot close` will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually - `@dependabot show ignore conditions` will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency - `@dependabot ignore this major version` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) - `@dependabot ignore this minor version` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) - `@dependabot ignore this dependency` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
openshift-ci[bot] commented 5 months ago

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign eranra for approval. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files: - **[OWNERS](https://github.com/netobserv/netobserv-ebpf-agent/blob/main/OWNERS)** Approvers can indicate their approval by writing `/approve` in a comment Approvers can cancel approval by writing `/approve cancel` in a comment
openshift-ci[bot] commented 5 months ago

Hi @dependabot[bot]. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a netobserv member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available [here](https://git.k8s.io/community/contributors/guide/pull-requests.md). If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the [kubernetes/test-infra](https://github.com/kubernetes/test-infra/issues/new?title=Prow%20issue:) repository.
codecov-commenter commented 5 months ago

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Project coverage is 33.41%. Comparing base (40c4f8b) to head (9c347b0).

Additional details and impacted files ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #324 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 33.41% 33.41% ======================================= Files 48 48 Lines 3477 3477 ======================================= Hits 1162 1162 Misses 2218 2218 Partials 97 97 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/netobserv/netobserv-ebpf-agent/pull/324/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=netobserv) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [unittests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/netobserv/netobserv-ebpf-agent/pull/324/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=netobserv) | `33.41% <ø> (ø)` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=netobserv#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.