NETOBSERV-1707: move to go 1.22

jotak commented 3 months ago

Description

Dependencies

n/a

Checklist

If you are not familiar with our processes or don't know what to answer in the list below, let us know in a comment: the maintainers will take care of that.

[x] Is this PR backed with a JIRA ticket? If so, make sure it is written as a title prefix (in general, PRs affecting the NetObserv/Network Observability product should be backed with a JIRA ticket - especially if they bring user facing changes).
[ ] Does this PR require product documentation?
- [ ] If so, make sure the JIRA epic is labelled with "documentation" and provides a description relevant for doc writers, such as use cases or scenarios. Any required step to activate or configure the feature should be documented there, such as new CRD knobs.
[ ] Does this PR require a product release notes entry?
- [ ] If so, fill in "Release Note Text" in the JIRA.
[ ] Is there anything else the QE team should know before testing? E.g: configuration changes, environment setup, etc.
- [ ] If so, make sure it is described in the JIRA ticket.
QE requirements (check 1 from the list):
- [ ] Standard QE validation, with pre-merge tests unless stated otherwise.
- [ ] Regression tests only (e.g. refactoring with no user-facing change).
- [x] No QE (e.g. trivial change with high reviewer's confidence, or per agreement with the QE team).

openshift-ci-robot commented 3 months ago

@jotak: This pull request references NETOBSERV-1707 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.17.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to [this](https://github.com/netobserv/network-observability-cli/pull/51): >## Description > > > >## Dependencies > > >n/a > >## Checklist > >If you are not familiar with our processes or don't know what to answer in the list below, let us know in a comment: the maintainers will take care of that. > >* [x] Is this PR backed with a JIRA ticket? If so, make sure it is written as a title prefix _(in general, PRs affecting the NetObserv/Network Observability product should be backed with a JIRA ticket - especially if they bring user facing changes)._ >* [ ] Does this PR require product documentation? > * [ ] If so, make sure the JIRA epic is labelled with "documentation" and provides a description relevant for doc writers, such as use cases or scenarios. Any required step to activate or configure the feature should be documented there, such as new CRD knobs. >* [ ] Does this PR require a product release notes entry? > * [ ] If so, fill in "Release Note Text" in the JIRA. >* [ ] Is there anything else the QE team should know before testing? E.g: configuration changes, environment setup, etc. > * [ ] If so, make sure it is described in the JIRA ticket. >* QE requirements (check 1 from the list): > * [ ] Standard QE validation, with pre-merge tests unless stated otherwise. > * [ ] Regression tests only (e.g. refactoring with no user-facing change). > * [x] No QE (e.g. trivial change with high reviewer's confidence, or per agreement with the QE team). > Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available [here](https://prow.ci.openshift.org/command-help?repo=netobserv%2Fnetwork-observability-cli). If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the [openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin](https://github.com/openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin/issues/new) repository.

codecov[bot] commented 3 months ago

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Project coverage is 28.99%. Comparing base (90239f0) to head (553589e).

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #51 +/- ## ========================================== - Coverage 31.49% 28.99% -2.51% ========================================== Files 5 8 +3 Lines 962 1045 +83 ========================================== Hits 303 303 - Misses 637 720 +83 Partials 22 22 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/netobserv/network-observability-cli/pull/51/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=netobserv) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [unittests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/netobserv/network-observability-cli/pull/51/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=netobserv) | `28.99% <ø> (-2.51%)` | :arrow_down: | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=netobserv#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more. [see 3 files with indirect coverage changes](https://app.codecov.io/gh/netobserv/network-observability-cli/pull/51/indirect-changes?src=pr&el=tree-more&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=netobserv)

jotak commented 3 months ago

/approve

openshift-ci[bot] commented 3 months ago

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jotak

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files: - ~~[OWNERS](https://github.com/netobserv/network-observability-cli/blob/main/OWNERS)~~ [jotak] Approvers can indicate their approval by writing `/approve` in a comment Approvers can cancel approval by writing `/approve cancel` in a comment

netobserv / network-observability-cli