Fields to include

[rasvaan]

It might be a good idea to discuss which fields we want to include in the mappings. This in order to take the source data as starting point and not the data models.

I would prefer to start with the "basis registratie" fields and see how many of those have an equivalent in the three models. I don't know whether these are the same for every institution in the Netherlands and additions are welcome!

• Inventory number (Objectnummer)
• Record type (Recordtype)
• Parts (Delen)
• Object name (Objectnaam)
• Title (Titel)
• Creator (Vervaardiger)
• Date (Datering)
  • From (Van)
  • Till (Tot)
• Material (Materiaal)
• Dimensions (Afmetingen)
  • Value (waarde)
  • Unit (eenheid)
  • Dimension type (soort afmeting)
• Location (Huidige standsplaats)
• Keeper (Beheerder)
• Acquisition (Verwerving)
  • Acquisition method (Verwervingsmethode)
  • Acquisition date (Verwervingsdatum)
  • Acquisition from (Verworven van)

[ivozandhuis]

First step: are we describing the object, the digital online representation or the metadata?

[ivozandhuis]

Looks complete. What is the source?

[rasvaan]

My preference would be to start with describing the object. Not all institutions have information about representations in Adlib and also metadata for the object metadata is a little scarce.

The source of the list are the Rijksmuseums' documentation instructions. I can imagine these are based upon other sources, I will inquire about that. Would be interesting whether this list is shared with the other institutions involved.