Closed jhlasnik closed 1 year ago
hey @jhlasnik , was it working before? can you explain why you want to name interfaces ethX instead of swpX?
Hey @networkop, I found what my issue was I referenced the wrong topo file that I thought had them set as eth instead of swp in the file.
I ran into some other issues when trying to commit, once I have a chance to look at it again I'll open up another issue with the errors I'm having there.
In my initial testing of the 5.3 image I found that the current build is not changing the port names from eth1+ over to swp1+
Looking into the code for the netq agent on a physical switch I found this under the same file referenced below: https://github.com/networkop/cx/blob/main/Dockerfile-5.0.2#L151
line 931:
https://github.com/networkop/cx/blob/main/Dockerfile-5.3.0#L33 However it looks like we're no longer using that package based on the 5.1+ images so I'm not sure what packages is handling the name changes now.