Closed JoeZiminski closed 1 year ago
Looks good to me.
One comment: should we rename the SWC-BIDS specification
page to simply Specification
? It avoids duplication in the website header, and it should be implied.
Thanks a lot Niko these all look good and have updated. About sub-001 / ses-001 in the filename, I do remember discussing this but havn't seemed to put anything in my notes. I think you are right and we decided not to enfroce it - it's always a concern that the lack of sub/ses identifier makes it less easy to track bugs but I have a vague memory that we decided add it as a suggestion (which I could add to the specification now) but not mandate it. Does that sounds familiar? (I may have just accidently made it up 😆).
That does sound familiar, that's also what I remember. Nevertheless, we should consider this for future versions of the SWC-BIDS specification, and we should get the scientists/users' opinion on that.
Thanks all, I changes the file conventions section to only made recommendations
combine file_naming.md and folder_structure.md into a single page swc_bids_specification.md . make some small changes to the file_naming section.