Jupyter books on the website are not from neurolibre organization

[ltetrel]

the submissions on https://www.neurolibre.com/ points to various location:

• https://simexp.github.io
• https://mathieuboudreau.github.io
• http://qmrlab.org
• https://brainhack101.github.io

They should all point to https://neurolibre.github.io instead to disable bypassing our submission workflow.

[ltetrel]

I temporarily disabled the banned_specs config to allow for these notebooks to build correctly on our binderhub.

[emdupre]

At least one has been forked already, no? https://github.com/neurolibre/vcog_hps_ad_book

The others could either be forked or we could "submit" them to test out the submission workflow.

[agahkarakuzu]

@emdupre the submit workflow is available at https://github.com/roboneurotest right now, I can add them to NeuroLibre organization for testing.

[emdupre]

If we can use this as a test of the submission workflow, I think that'd be great !

One complication is that at least introML-book and vcog_hps_ad_book are already converted into Jupyter Books, so the build step of our workflow wouldn't work.

@ltetrel is right that we also have the introML repository, which would be a more accurate test. I'm not sure if there's something equivalent for vcog_hps_ad. Do you know, @ltetrel ?

[ltetrel]

Yes I already converted it to jupyter book, but I could also take the raw repo https://github.com/SIMEXP/vcog_hps_ad and we could test on that.

[emdupre]

@agahkarakuzu can correct me if I'm wrong, but I think we should in fact be working with the original repositories for roboneuro :robot: to work off of !

[agahkarakuzu]

@emdupre yes, the only reason I kept script in a different repo was not to bother people with thousands of notifications :)

I can move them here sometime tomorrow, would that be ok?