This roadmap also gives us a chance to consider the scope of nobrainer. in my opinion, nobrainer should provide models, losses, metrics, layers, and TFRecord I/O for magnetic resonance imaging in 3D. also guides for how to use nobrainer. i think the training wrapper in nobrainer should be removed, and instead, examples should explain how to train different models (e.g., for semantic segmentation, GANs, classifiers, etc.).
The plan is to check off all these boxes by the end of july...
This roadmap also gives us a chance to consider the scope of nobrainer. in my opinion, nobrainer should provide models, losses, metrics, layers, and TFRecord I/O for magnetic resonance imaging in 3D. also guides for how to use nobrainer. i think the training wrapper in nobrainer should be removed, and instead, examples should explain how to train different models (e.g., for semantic segmentation, GANs, classifiers, etc.).
cc: @wazeerzulfikar @satra
related to https://github.com/ohbm/hackathon2019/issues/79