Refactor `src/gnu`

[alexsavulescu]

Not familiar with all the code in gnu (except for the d_avec refactoring to std::vector) A couple of ideas to brainstorm:

• random generators + distribution -> use std library ? Can all be replaced? Do we have a 1to1 replacement in the std library? Do we need to maintain all of them? Binary differences to be expected
• [x] complex -> move to std::complex ?
• [x] ACG : can be replaced by Random123 generator
• [ ] Binomial : https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/numeric/random/binomial_distribution
• [ ] DiscUnif : https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/numeric/random/uniform_int_distribution
• [ ] Erlang : https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/numeric/random/gamma_distribution
• [ ] Geom : https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/numeric/random/geometric_distribution
• [ ] HypGeom :
• [ ] LogNorm : https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/numeric/random/lognormal_distribution
• [x] MLCG : can be replaced by Random123 generator
• [ ] NegExp : https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/numeric/random/exponential_distribution
• [ ] Normal : https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/numeric/random/normal_distribution
• [ ] Poisson : https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/numeric/random/poisson_distribution
• [ ] RndInt :
• [ ] Uniform : https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/numeric/random/uniform_real_distribution
• [ ] Weibull : https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/numeric/random/weibull_distribution

[nrnhines]

I'd be delighted to see the gnu subdirectory disappear.

[alexsavulescu]

Was discussing today about PRNGs, we were wondering if we shouldn't drop some unused number generators?

https://nrn.readthedocs.io/en/latest/python/programming/math/random.html?highlight=random#Random.ACG

As far as I understand , only Random123 and MCellRan4 are of interest wrt support for parallel simulations. Do we have any usecase for the rest? If so, I imagine we can use std implementations for most of them (readily available)

cc: @jamesgking

[ramcdougal]

For what it's worth, MLCG and ACG do not appear to be used in any ModelDB entries.