Closed pramodk closed 1 month ago
✔️ 116cb6572fa67766206dbccc8ede8d1fdf25ff54 -> Azure artifacts URL
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Project coverage is 67.26%. Comparing base (
1f1f8c9
) to head (dfc1b9f
).
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
Logfiles from GitLab pipeline #221060 (:white_check_mark:) have been uploaded here!
Status and direct links:
After re-reading realise that I was missing a reference to an interesting/useful screenshot where we see the latencies with the object size:
Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues
Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code
✔️ dfc1b9f093219aeba9524002262597171d8c5782 -> Azure artifacts URL
Logfiles from GitLab pipeline #221103 (:white_check_mark:) have been uploaded here!
Status and direct links:
@pramodk Thanks! I'm looking forward to using this to look at differences in destructive cacheline shareing between master and #2951 for the #2787 model.
This could be further expanded but I think this is already a good start!
Related to #2951 and #2787.
The documentation draft is available here: https://nrn.readthedocs.io/en/pramodk-vtune-usage-docs/install/debug.html#profiling-with-intel-vtune