Better document how to do manual QC and keep provenance of who did the QC

neuropoly / template

A framework for creating unbiased MRI templates of the spinal cord

MIT License

5 stars 3 forks source link

Better document how to do manual QC and keep provenance of who did the QC #58

Closed jcohenadad closed 11 months ago

jcohenadad commented 1 year ago

this section: https://github.com/neuropoly/template/blob/25267b7268b0a4f6d986a0ff083dabcc5b469c8f/README.md#14-quality-control-qc-labels

there is now a good procedure put in place by @sandrinebedard and @valosekj (can you please cross-ref the script?)

valosekj commented 1 year ago

For the html QC report, we usually have repo-specific instructions for each project. For example, here for CanProCo project.

Regarding manual corrections, we have manual-correction repo. The repo contains the manual_correction.py script, which can be used for manual correction of spinal cord segmentation, disc labels, centerline etc. The repo also contains a wiki with examples.

valosekj commented 1 year ago

Hmm, actually, on spinalcordtoolbox.com web, we have QC report section. We could extend this section by moving appropriate parts from the CanProCo repo. Then, we could reference the updated QC report section across projects/repos.

NadiaBlostein commented 11 months ago

Fixed on branch nb/issues_59_and_41, commit 1c6afee97272b2799134bde518b86f7c6f4d674b