while optimizing the generated css I noticed that by default (if all formats are requested) you generate .woff references before .woff2 in the css file.
From my testing, this leads compatible browsers (current Firefox, Safari, Chrome) to prefer the slightly larger .woff files over the more optimal .woff2.
Therefore I propose to switch the default order. (This is also something that FontAwesome does by the way, which I where I first noticed this).
dwt
commented
6 years ago
Hi there,
while optimizing the generated css I noticed that by default (if all formats are requested) you generate .woff references before .woff2 in the css file.
From my testing, this leads compatible browsers (current Firefox, Safari, Chrome) to prefer the slightly larger .woff files over the more optimal .woff2.
Therefore I propose to switch the default order. (This is also something that FontAwesome does by the way, which I where I first noticed this).
What do you think?