Closed ouerum closed 3 years ago
Hi the reentrancy implementation in contract-library.com has nothing to do with oldclient.dl and uses Gigahorse, not Vandal. MadMax only detects gas-related vulnerabilities, although the techniques developed have inspired later work such as Gigahorse.
Thanks for your respond. Have you published the datalog file of the implementation in contract-library.com in github?
No we haven't yet
Well, I am looking forward your related work about smart contract analysis. The job of madmax and gigahorse is prefect!
Hi ouerum, it should now be relatively straightforward to implement your client (or other clients) using the underlying framework.
Got it, I have forked gigahorse a week ago, thank a lot for your notifications. Gigahorse has helped my analysis project for smart contracts. 😃
在 2020年12月27日,上午4:38,Neville Grech notifications@github.com 写道:
Closed #3https://github.com/nevillegrech/MadMax/issues/3.
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/nevillegrech/MadMax/issues/3#event-4149827405, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AICAX6BMNPMTN2JSLLDDT2LSWZCU5ANCNFSM4LRFS4BQ.
Hello, I have a question after reading your paper 'Elipmoc: Advanced Decompilation of Ethereum Smart Contracts’. I have clone the Gigahorse project from Github in Dec 2020(0be6260f), is it the code of Elipmoc (gigahorse 2.0) or the original Gigahorse?
Thanks a lot for your reply. 在 2020年12月27日 +0800 10:15,何 嘉浩 @.***>,写道:
Got it, I have forked gigahorse a week ago, thank a lot for your notifications. Gigahorse has helped my analysis project for smart contracts. 😃
在 2020年12月27日,上午4:38,Neville Grech @.***> 写道:
Closed #3. — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
Hi, I have used your famous Ethereum smart contract vulnerability detect tool, Madmax. I find only 3 vulnerability about DOS can be detected. Could madmax defect other bug? I can't find the souffle file about other bug except
oldclient.dl
. But the result from this souffle file is not well, more than 50% was flagged with reentrance, the false positive may be too high. Another word, I am interesting in your related work, gigahorse. The result of gigahorse from contract-lib is lower than 50% in detecting reentrancy, have you change to use another souffle file to detect, or the same fileoldclient.dl
?