newrelic / node-test-utilities

Test helpers for Node.js instrumentation modules
Apache License 2.0
5 stars 15 forks source link

Release v8.2.0 #187

Closed github-actions[bot] closed 5 months ago

github-actions[bot] commented 5 months ago

Proposed Release Notes

Links

Details

codecov[bot] commented 5 months ago

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Comparison is base (e428e65) 80.07% compared to head (8ee7e6c) 80.07%.

Additional details and impacted files ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #187 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 80.07% 80.07% ======================================= Files 23 23 Lines 3347 3347 ======================================= Hits 2680 2680 Misses 667 667 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/newrelic/node-test-utilities/pull/187/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=newrelic) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [unit-tests-16.x](https://app.codecov.io/gh/newrelic/node-test-utilities/pull/187/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=newrelic) | `80.07% <ø> (ø)` | | | [unit-tests-18.x](https://app.codecov.io/gh/newrelic/node-test-utilities/pull/187/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=newrelic) | `80.07% <ø> (ø)` | | | [unit-tests-20.x](https://app.codecov.io/gh/newrelic/node-test-utilities/pull/187/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=newrelic) | `80.07% <ø> (ø)` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=newrelic#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

bizob2828 commented 5 months ago

As an aside we should prob PR this repo to rely on conventional commits and flip the prep release to use that method instead of the old template base method. Recent PR for reference